Housing supply (or lack thereof) determines why some tech cities remain affordable, and others don’t.
Homeowners, not developers, are really the ones who benefit financially when we limit housing supply.
When it comes to urban density, we’re not all goldilocks. We don’t all want the same porridge.
Why is one considered a national crisis, and the other tolerated as par for the course?
If new construction increased home prices, then why are rents also going up in the L.A. neighborhoods that don’t build?