When riding the New York City subway, does it ever feel like every elevator or escalator you encounter is broken? This isn’t the stuff of hyperbole. NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer’s recent audit of New York MTA’s elevator and escalator maintenance practices wasn’t pretty, spotlighting serial neglect and dysfunction in the MTA’s Division of Elevators and Escalators (E&E).
While elevator and escalator maintenance failure affects every subway rider at one point or another, it has a profound impact on people with disabilities, parents pushing strollers, and the growing number of older New Yorkers who require step-free subway access. Stringer’s audit came on the heels of a lawsuit filed last month by people with disabilities alleging that the MTA has failed time and time again to make the subways reliably accessible.
Stringer’s investigation uncovered the following failures:
The findings are alarming, raising questions about if, when, and how elevators and escalators are inspected and repaired, and whether anyone is managing the process. They also shed light on why the MTA’s subway elevators and escalators break so often.
Sadly, Stringer’s audit is the only the most recent in a growing canon of investigations into the MTA’s elevator problems. This collection of reports, going back to 2000, indicates that the MTA has made few efforts to improve elevators and escalators, or to take accessibility seriously.
As a whole, this 17-year history of investigation tells us that the MTA’s approach to subway accessibility is broken. As the Hevesi audit intimates, the agency is less concerned with the rider experience than it is with checking the ADA compliance box, treating accessibility as a legal, financial and operational burden worthy only of bare minimum effort.
This problem has persisted for so long because of a lack of leadership on the issue and no accountability for performance within the MTA. Whereas Boston’s MBTA and Chicago’s CTA have both set up internal accessibility offices precisely to increase accountability and accelerate progress, New York remains wedded to meeting the letter rather than the spirit of its ADA settlement.
Nearly 27 years after passage of the ADA, it shouldn’t take court action and external audits to make an accessible subway system a reality in New York City. Governor Cuomo and MTA leadership should prioritize subway accessibility in both capital planning and daily operations simply because it’s the right thing to do.
[This article was originally published by Transit Center]
We are 14 people from myriad backgrounds, including departments of transportation, transit agencies, taxi drivers, advocacy, elected office, and international development, who are to improve transit.
A podcast on Market Urbanism, or the cross between free-market policies and urban issues. We discuss how a liberalized urban approach would lead to more housing, faster transport, improved public services, and better quality of life. Tap to listen.
Market Urbanism Report is sponsored by Panoramic Interests, a progressive developer in San Francisco. Panoramic, which is owned by Patrick Kennedy, specializes in 160 sqft micro-units (called MicroPads) that are built using modular construction materials. Panoramic has long touted these units as a cost-effective way to house San Francisco’s growing homeless population. But Panoramic also builds larger units of between 440-690 sqft. To learn more about Panoramic’s micro-unit model, read MUR’s coverage on the firm in its America’s Progressive Developers series. Or visit Panoramic’s website.