Since the New York Stock and Exchange Board was incorporated over 200 years ago, New York City—specifically Wall Street—has been synonymous with finance. But from 2000-2016, finance jobs in the city dropped 30%. Recently, a group of financial associations blasted potential stock taxes (several are being debated in the state legislature) and threatened to reduce their presence in the city. But this dispute is just one of many complications in the city’s relationship with one of its flagship industries, and the city must address them if it wants to keep these jobs.
Market forces have had a decentralizing effect on the entire sector for some time. One factor is outsourcing—Deloitte statistics show that by 2007, 75% of financial service firms had offshored some function. The firm notes that “more than half the institutions reporting enjoyed savings of at least 40 percent for each business process offshored, although some processes had savings as high as 70 percent.”
A second factor is competition. An increasing number of financial transactions can be handled by the growing universe of “Fintech” applications, or automated options for investing and banking, such as PayPal or Bitcoin. As BuiltIn writes, “machine learning algorithms, blockchain and data science [can accommodate] everything from process credit risks to run hedge funds.”
Fintech’s potential could impact many Wall Street functions, hurting the long-term competitiveness of institutional firms like Goldman Sachs and Bank of America. One analysis found that nearly 60 percent of banking customers utilized some sort of app-based service for financial dealings prior to 2020.
A third factor is retail investing, which is when non-professional investors forgo money managers and invest on their own, using intuitive brokerage platforms like Robinhood. Business Insider reports that 20-25% of daily trading activity is done off Wall Street in this way.
Then there is the looming question of remote work once the COVID-19 pandemic ends. While companies are not fleeing New York, surveys find a preference for sustained “hybrid” arrangements. If firms have fewer in-office staff on any given day, that reduces the need to maintain large offices in an expensive city.
Still, the death of New York’s finance sector is not rendered inevitable by automation and offshoring, and these factors only explain part of the exodus.
When Wall Street financial management firm AllianceBernstein moved its headquarters from New York City to Nashville, CEO Seth Bernstein cited the cheaper cost of living, shorter commutes, and friendlier business climate as key benefits over New York.
Indeed, New York’s middle- and even upper-middle-class earners struggle with local housing costs. The median rent in January 2020 was $3,000 per month, America’s second-highest. Nor do the suburbs offer much relief: median home prices in the Tri-State area range from $471,000 to over $590,000. Meanwhile, living costs are much cheaper in Tennessee, Florida, North Carolina, and other places where finance jobs have moved.
The answer to this problem is clear: build more housing. Yet New York’s harsh, complex zoning makes this difficult.
Actually getting to work is hard, too. The city’s famed transit system has become increasingly unreliable, and extensions have become prohibitively expensive and lengthy. Drivers spend 13% of their time in traffic.
Taxes add to the burden; New York State’s corporate tax rate is among the country’s highest. Businesses have long paid these taxes to take advantage of New York’s agglomeration effects, but declining quality of life may override these benefits. Add a stock tax of .5% on trades, and the state legislature will be targeting the finance industry in particular.
In 1983, The New York Times’ editorial board warned that “If a computer in Atlanta can execute stock trades…there is no compelling reason why the paperwork shouldn’t also be done in Atlanta...New York needs the securities industry more than the securities industry needs New York.”
This is even truer today, as technology and globalization disrupt and democratize the industry. If, on top of this, Albany and city hall do things that make New York City difficult for financial firms, we will see a continued decline of Wall Street.
[This article was originally published by the Independent Institute.]
Scott Beyer owns and manages The Market Urbanism Report. He is a roving cross-country journalist who writes regular columns for Forbes, Governing Magazine and HousingOnline.com.
A podcast on Market Urbanism, or the cross between free-market policies and urban issues. We discuss how a liberalized urban approach would lead to more housing, faster transport, improved public services, and better quality of life. Tap to listen.
Market Urbanism Report is sponsored by Panoramic Interests, a progressive developer in San Francisco. Panoramic, which is owned by Patrick Kennedy, specializes in 160 sqft micro-units (called MicroPads) that are built using modular construction materials. Panoramic has long touted these units as a cost-effective way to house San Francisco’s growing homeless population. But Panoramic also builds larger units of between 440-690 sqft. To learn more about Panoramic’s micro-unit model, read MUR’s coverage on the firm in its America’s Progressive Developers series. Or visit Panoramic’s website.
Market Urbanism Report is a media company that advances free-market city policy. We aim for a liberalized approach that produces cheaper housing, faster transport and better quality-of-life.
Market Urbanism is a theory calling for free-market solutions to urban problems. Rooted in classical liberalism, it posits that cities work best through the bottom-up, private sector activity of many individuals, not top-down government plans. In this nifty guide, Scott Beyer describes how these free-market ideas can apply to housing, transport and public administration. You can purchase the book (including one signed by the author) below.