Northeastern University’s Barry Bluestone released the 15th Greater Boston Housing Report Card, an exhaustive analysis of supply and demand factors in the Boston metro area.
In the report, Bluestone advocates creating transit-oriented “21st Century Villages” with variable unit sizes and amenities in buildings up to 35 stories. He envisions a village as having anything from apartments to “pods” of four-to-six single bedrooms with private baths, but shared kitchen and living rooms. The villages would also be for empty-nesters. They would even be prefabricated and could be manufactured in a Boston-area factory.
In addition to design, Bluestone suggests that public financing and deed restrictions on rent-increases be used. Municipalities and the Commonwealth should also change their laws to permit villages by-right.
But really, the trouble with affordable housing in Boston has never been financing or design. The trouble has always been getting NIMBYs to let it be built. Housing is a political problem.
Matthew M. Robare is a freelance journalist based in Boston.
A podcast on Market Urbanism, or the cross between free-market policies and urban issues. We discuss how a liberalized urban approach would lead to more housing, faster transport, improved public services, and better quality of life. Tap to listen.
Market Urbanism Report is sponsored by Panoramic Interests, a progressive developer in San Francisco. Panoramic, which is owned by Patrick Kennedy, specializes in 160 sqft micro-units (called MicroPads) that are built using modular construction materials. Panoramic has long touted these units as a cost-effective way to house San Francisco’s growing homeless population. But Panoramic also builds larger units of between 440-690 sqft. To learn more about Panoramic’s micro-unit model, read MUR’s coverage on the firm in its America’s Progressive Developers series. Or visit Panoramic’s website.